Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on May 25, 2008
Family Practice 2008 25(3):202-208; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/3/202    most recent
cmn018v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, C.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, C.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Computers in the new consultation: within the first minute

Christopher Pearcea, Stephen Trumblea, Michael Arnoldb, Kathryn Dwanc and Christine Phillipsc

a Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053
b Department of History and Philosophy of Science, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053
c Academic Unit of General Practice and Community Health, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Correspondence to Christopher Pearce, Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia; Email: chris_pearce{at}mac.com

Received 27 July 2007; Accepted 14 April 2008.


  Abstract

Background. Computers are now commonplace in the general practice consultation in many countries and literature is beginning to appear that describes the effects of this presence on the doctor–patient relationship. Concepts such as patient centredness emphasize the importance of this relationship to patient outcomes, yet the presence of the computer has introduced another partner to that relationship.

Objective. To describe the patient–doctor–computer relationship during the opening period of the consultation.

Methods. Twenty GPs provided 141 consultations for direct observation, using digital video. Consultations were analysed according to Goffman's dramaturgical methodology.

Results. Openings could be described as doctor, patient or computer openings, according to the source of initial influence on the consultation. Specific behaviours can be described within those three categories.

Conclusions. The presence of the computer has changed the beginning of the consultation. Where once only two actors needed to perform their roles, now three interact in differing ways. Information comes from many sources, and behaviour responds accordingly. Future studies of the consultation need to take into account the impact of the computer in shaping how the consultation flows and the information needs of all participants.

Keywords. Physician–patient relationship, medical informatics, office visits, computers, qualitative research.

Pearce C, Trumble S, Arnold M, Dwan K and Phillips C. Computers in the new consultation, within the first minute. Family Practice 2008; 25: 202–208.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
B. C Delaney
Potential for improving patient safety by computerized decision support systems
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 137 - 138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.